In American society today, grossly disproportionate racial disparities are usually meet with cries of racism from the media and sociology departments at top universities, which quickly seek to “rectify” the situation. While true equality is a noble and honorable endeavor for any society, we must be careful and analyze the situation before making assumptions based on generalities and questionable data. Society has a duty to make sure that they do not take rash action in the name of equality, which may end up in unwarranted discrimination against another group of people. For example, policy initiatives which seek to rectify inequality, such as Affirmative Action, falsely include grossly overrepresented non-gentiles in the white category, which dramatically skews the data. Although non-gentiles make up only 2% of the population, they comprise 10.25% of America’s millionaires, 36% of America’s billionaires, 45% of Forbes’ 40 richest Americans, and 100% of the top two Federal Reserve positions, among other things. As such, it could be argued that any law that favors big business and the wealthy, of which there are plenty, are inherently anti-gentile. The media and elite academia, which also have a dramatic overrepresentation of non-gentiles, have always taken this line of reasoning when it relates to racial disparities between whites, blacks, and latinos.
In New York, it now costs one million dollars to own a medallion, which gives one the right to operate a taxi cab. This regulation pushed out most of the black, white, and latino gentile entrepreneurs who couldn’t afford to purchase the medallion. At this point, only big businesses and extremely wealthy people, both of which are disproportionately non-gentile, can afford to operate taxis in New York. In Washington D.C., a group of taxi kings paid a lobbyist $775 an hr to push for a medallion system aimed at ousting black gentile entrepreneurial cab drivers. Even the paid lobbyist was hard pressed to list the benefits of the medallion system when asked. Taxi drivers in D.C. are currently bound by professional codes of conduct and are cited when breaking these rules. Almost all of these taxi drivers oppose the proposed medallion system as it will force them into the employ of a few wealthy businessmen.
In response to historical discrimination, non-gentiles have learned to effectively lobby the government to pass laws that protect their rights. Unfortunately, in some cases non-gentile businessmen have abused this practice to pass crony capitalist laws that push out competitors. One might remember the notorious Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal for example. As with some other groups, non-gentiles also have a long history of lobbying for policy initiatives that are beneficial to their racial interests. Through great skill and the accumulation of vast amounts of wealth, non-gentiles have been able to build some of the most powerful lobbies in Washington, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). AIPAC now boasts a 100,000 strong membership that influences dozens of American foreign policy decisions every year. Unfortunately, almost all of these policy initiatives are negative for the United States, as a former CIA Chief emphatically states in the video below.
In fact, Non-gentile lobbying is so strong that they are allowed to operate the only foreign lobby in the United States that is precluded from registering under the Foreign Registration Act. This is especially shocking considering that AIPAC has been caught red-handed spying on America for Israel. Perhaps this special consideration has to do with the fact that non-gentiles give an estimated 50% of all political contributions in America. Not an altogether surprising statistic considering that Goldman Sachs was Obama’s largest financial contributor and Sheldon Adelson is single handedly financing Newt Gingrich.
Many new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and financial regulations increase the costs to small businesses, which is leading to the eradication of the American middle class. Sarbanes-Oxley, which failed to prevent both the Maddoff scandal and the 2008 financial meltdown, adds an extra $3 million per year in compliance costs for the average NYSE company. These costs disproportionately affect gentile operators, who do not possess the same financial capital, thereby putting them out of business while allowing the wealthiest Americans to acquire their businesses and build massive multi-national conglomerates.
Affirmative Action is also being used in conjunction with tribalistic and nepotistic non-gentile hiring practices to keep gentiles from rising the social ladder. As Kevin McDonald, a California State University professor, concluded, “These data strongly suggest that Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities has nothing to do with IQ but with discrimination against non-Jewish White Americans….It would be interesting to see the dynamics of the admissions process. How many admissions officers are Jewish? And, whether or not they are Jewish,what pressures are they under to admit Jewish students?” The answer to his question is that 12-35% of the Ivy League student population is non-gentile and nearly 80% of the people in the top administrative positions are either non-gentile or married to non-gentiles. This link provides the names and tittles of the Ivy League administrators.
This is in part why non-gentiles have become proportionally wealthier than gentiles over the last 150 years. The truth of the matter is that there is very little inequality between whites, blacks, and latinos when non-gentile people are subtracted from the white column. Non-gentiles represent only 2% of the population yet comprise 33% of the Supreme Court, 64% of the Federal Reserve including the top two spots, 10% of the Senate, and 6.5% of the House of Representatives. In addition, non-gentiles control about 90% of the American media. Given these figures, it is statistically impossible for white gentiles to be over-represented in many of these positions. What is really taking place is that non-gentile tribalism and nepotism keeps blacks and latinos from positions of power and influence, but uses their media to blame the inequality on white racism.
The following video provides the names, pictures, and titles of the non-gentiles mentioned in the article: